LOL that comment says more about you than me, and I didn't bring up politics "in this story", I merely pointed out that SuperKendall is a pure, tribal hypocrite. And he denigrates real scientists by knowingly misusing their words against them and claiming that there is a conspiracy among "government-funded committees" to stamp out any heretical ideas that dare question the Big Bang. Hold on to your hats, here come the Creationsists, absurd to suggest this "disproves the big bang", Re:Just goes to show - I took in it in the ass fro. how much caffeine in taster's choice instant coffee. But, c'mon. Looking in the past, there is the 1995 discovery of the top quark, although I think that one is unlikely. Just wait and see, it'll happen. [wikipedia.org] Oh wait! According to Big Bang theory, the most distant galaxies in the JWST images are seen as they were only 400-500 million years after the origin of the universe. The Big Bang is the name of the most respected theory of the creation of the universe. I want to say I've heard one or two theories that predict it. Some people grumble about how the show represents the scientists in a cartoonish way, and there is truth in the criticism. None of this is surprising to Lee McIntyre, a philosopher of science at Boston University and author of the book How to Talk to a Science Denier (opens in new tab) (MIT Press, 2021). Click on the "predicted based on a non-expanding universe" link and download the PDF - the author gets right into redshift from the introduction on. So to bolster evidence the Big Bang theory is incorrect, you'd need to explain the CMB another way. As for the rest of your comment, it's all projection as it always is, and you'll never be over Trump. The season, as well as the series, concluded on May 16, 2019. Visit our corporate site (opens in new tab). All the more so if you've tied years of your life and reputation to the pursuit of an idea based on a theory that, oh by the way, is wrong. at the Disco with his title. A GTOE is being diligently sought, but there's no reason to believe that a Grand Theory Of Everything will be easy enough to calculate that it will replace EITHER quantum theory or relativityexcept in certain really special cases. Spice up your small talk with the latest tech news, products and reviews. Lerner's dismissive of the CMB, and his proposal for the observationhas been disprovenin the past. (Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, and STScI), SpaceX Crew-6 astronaut launch: Live updates, James Webb Space Telescope's stunning 'Phantom Galaxy' picture looks like a wormhole, Gallery: James Webb Space Telescope's 1st photos, Jupiter's auroras look radiant in new James Webb Space Telescope images, Pictures from space! In a nutshell, the theory suggests everything, everywhere, all at once suddenly burst to life. It's a pretty safe bet that anyone asking this question doesn't really understand what a scientific theory is. He conducts his research using the Compact Muon Solenoid detector located at the Large Hadron Collider. If only someone could compile a list of problems. But back it up with data. On this explainer, Neil deGrasse Tyson and comic co-host Chuck Nice break down Big Bang skepticism and what's going on at the frontier of astrophysics. Light loses energy as it travels through space. Jupiter and Venus 'kiss' in a stunning planetary conjunction tonight. In the episode "The Confirmation Polarization (opens in new tab)" Sheldon and Amy receive an email from Fermilab. You can't argue but that his paper follows best scientific method: it takes a theory, makes a prediction, and then via JWST measures results that confirm the theory. That's doesn't mean scientists won't find evidence overturning the Big Bang theory. NASA's James Webb has not provided evidence the Big Bang didn't happen. The two researchers were flown (in economy plusmore on that later) to Caltech to meet Amy and Sheldon. The Big Bang theory is still on solid ground, despite pseudoscientific attempts to twist JWST's findings. It allstarted with an article at The Institute of Art and Ideas, a British philosophical organization, on Aug. 11. Having a starting point obviously makes our rudimentary mathematical formulas fit better, but it stretches credulity in a common sense sort of way. The Big Bang is an explosion of space, and not into space. 6. Cosmology's standard model describes how the first galaxies were formed through a hierarchical process, involving small clouds of gas and clusters of stars coming together to form larger nascent galaxies. This is not one of those times. Cosmology and particle physics overlap quite a bit. What other testable idea/theory/whatever is out there to explain what we see? "It upset me because there are a lot of people very interested in science, but who don't have the background to distinguish fact from fiction, and they read something like this and think it's true.". Recent observations by the James Webb Space Telescope have not disproven the big bang, despite certain popular articles claiming otherwise. It makes sense why it's caught fire: It's a controversial idea that upends what we think we know about the cosmos. Or space? They shouldn't even tease like that. That said, I'm always rooting for breaking physics - it doesn't happen very often, but that's when the real exciting science happens. Has the Webb Telescope Disproved the Big Bang Theory? That's an even worse mistake than Rumsfeld, who was merely credulous that smart people had turned the unknowns into knowns. The power of new ideas. (It still works as well as it ever did, but it was really clunky and difficult to use compared to Newtonian mechanics.). If observed, that's another Nobel. In the meantime, astronomers continue to learn more about the early universe with the fantastic data coming down from JWST. The Big Bang Theory The Citation Negation. At the end of the series, Sheldon and Amy win the Nobel Prize for their Super-Asymmetry theory. Everybody knows that when you turn the flashlight off, the speed of light ceases to exist. summary is misleading. It starts with the recent Sky&Telescope article (a well respected semi-technical magazine for amateur astronomers) and then slides into various writings of Eric Lerner, whose ideas are not much accepted in the professional fields he writes about. A lot is happening in Young Sheldon season 6. makes a big mistake. "Relatedly, we also don't have a good theory of physics in general. Regions of the cosmos vastly separated from each other have . The surprising finding that galaxies in the early universe are more plentiful, and a little more massive and structured than expected, doesn't mean that the Big Bang is wrong. The idea that the universe expanded from a single point was first presented in a scientific. Not sure what happened. EditorDavid. However, as of yet there is no evidence for SUSY. That was, until mid-August, when she received a text from a friend saying that there was an article originally published by an organization called the Institute of Art and Ideas but now being republished on mainstream news sites saying that JWST's observations of distant galaxies had disproved the Big Bang, which is not correct. Just not the kind that would undo the Big Bang theory. And what has changed? The big bang is not dead. So this episode was brought to my attention becausewellFermilab. The Big Bang theory-haters all aspire to be cosmic revolutionariesand that's precisely what all scientists want to be, too. Now this twat is jumping on it as proof that he is right and everyone else is wrong. Adilson Motter, Northwestern UniversityAfter 12 successful seasons, "The Big Bang Theory" has finally come to a fulfilling end, concluding its reign as the longest running multicamera sitcom . To answer that question, and show why we should be skeptical of claims like this, we need to understand where the idea came from. When Sheldon declined to be nominated without Amy, there is historical precedent. New York, Everyone who isn't a neo-luddite, except those here to laugh at the neo-luddites left. He makes sure that the writers don't include any scientific topic that is too outlandish and disreputable. In "The Citation Negation" episode, Amy and Sheldon are devastated after learning from a Russian paper that Super Asymmetry has already been discovered and disproven. If they behave differently, it could be the explanation for why the universe is made of matter and not equal parts of matter and antimatter. I decline to identify him on the grounds that everybody who has met him agrees with me.) Lerner apparently proposes that the cosmological redshift is produced by a small part of a static universe collapsing then re-expanding. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Heres how it works. Kirkpatrick said. That the sun will rise tomorrow is just an astronomical prediction not a fact. If galaxies formed that early it probably means the conditions shortly after the big bang were more conducive to star and galaxy formation than was previously believed. As long as an hypothesis is testable, it remains an hypothesis. The show states that this notion revolves around subatomic particles known as kaons and how they react to certain stimuli and situations. So practically speaking the BBT seems to be on last legs here, as very few predictions based on that model seem to be accurate - thus it's a. I was gently wondering what applications BBT actually has. Perhaps this person has angered some. The prevailing theory is everything that is began with the Big Bang. Published works there do not necessarily need to pertain to known physical reality. I suppose that I should tell you about the one thing in the "The Confirmation Polarization (opens in new tab)" that rang totally false. The age of galaxies out to 13.5 billion years? This is simply not true. Well, as far as I know, the evidence still points to older stars having less metals, meaning the astronomical definition of metals, anything other then hydrogen and helium.With our understanding of life, or life as we know it, means only so much time for civilizations to evolve and a lot of things had to go right for us to be here, including 4.5 billion years of a fairly stable Earth.Be interesting if we can figure out what these ancient (according to the Big bang Theory) galaxies are made out of. Re:Challenge big bang or galaxy formation? disprove their effectiveness . Which would be an incredible finding, if proven. Or literally every one of your positions on COVID? Those are fertile grounds for Nobel prizes as well. We are not responsible for them in any way. IIUC, string theories can get rid of the singularities. Or made unjustified assumptions in our previous predictions. I had no idea this was a political argument. That's the definition of 'creationist,' so yes. Jupiter's auroras look radiant in new James Webb Space Telescope images. Nothing widely accepted, but if these results are confirmed they might be getting a lot more attention. But the nomination process is different. Phil. The Confirmation Polarization, however, reveals some truly flawed logic on the part of the creators. After Mockery, Mark Zuckerberg Promises Better Metaverse Graphics, Posts New Avatar, Free, Secure, and Open-Source: How FileZilla is Making an Old School Protocol Cool Again, "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all." What they're saying is if you question an established theory you must provide your evidence to show why it's wrong and/or why your theory is better. Lerner's piece uses some of the early JWST studies to attempt to dismiss the Big Bang theory. I for one am excited that Slashdot is carrying electric universe stories again. Could two guys at a laboratory like Fermilab confirm a theory like Super Asymmetry using kaons? 3:35 AM. I decline to ask anyone on grounds that I don't want to know the answer. Quotes expressing a sceptical attitude against transfinity or addressing questionable points of current mathematics based on it are collected in chapter V. We're right." Members of the Swedish Academy of Sciences can nominate, as can previous Nobel laureates and some distinguished professors who are asked for recommendations. And the "Panic alarm" serves to bring all hands on deck to cross-examine the failure from every angle. No matter how much evidence supports a theory, to disprove it it's only necessary to provide evidence that invalidates it; how and when that happens is - up to a point - a matter of scientific consensus, which certainly hasn't happened here yet, but that's the acid test. Supersymmetry (SUSY) is an existing theory that provides an explanation for a number of unsolved issues in elementary particle physics. Astronomers are able to engage with the public and put a human face to the science in a way that is more difficult for researchers in some other scientific fields. In the intervening decades, observations have only strengthened the case for the Big. If you don't have the ability to evaluate evidence, then you must rely on other people. That these early galaxies seem a little more evolved than expected in JWST's observations is an intriguing astrophysical puzzle that confounds current models of galaxy growth. Perhaps this person has angered some. Are we rethinking the Big Bang? Wait! We'll have to wait a bit. Credit: grandunificationtheory.com Posted on December 17, 2015 February 8, 2023 by Matt Williams New Moai statue that 'deified ancestors' found on Easter Island, Lab-grown minibrains will be used as 'biological hardware' to create new biocomputers, scientists propose, Ancient Roman 'spike defenses' made famous by Julius Caesar found in Germany, 'Building blocks of life' recovered from asteroid Ryugu are older than the solar system itself, The ultimate action-packed science and technology magazine bursting with exciting information about the universe, Subscribe today and save an extra 5% with checkout code 'LOVE5', Engaging articles, amazing illustrations & exclusive interviews, Issues delivered straight to your door or device.